You are right to be confused by the advertisement.
Whoever wrote that blurb doesn't know what they are talking about. The sentence is cut off and/or doesn't make sense.
First off, they mention the optical density, by which I presume they mean epsilon, the electric permittivity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permittivity of the material is greater than 4. You can't tell anything about the transmission of a frequency of light only given that number since transmission is material dependent and generally non-linear with w (omega - angular frequency). Prescription lenses are made by varying the curvature of the lens in accordance to what epsilon is, as we can see basically by Snell's law n1*sin(theta1)=n2*sin(theta2). There are much more advanced lens maker's equations but they are basically derived from this. We can see that the angle of incidence, reflection, and refraction (transmitted through) depend on epsilon, but this has little to do with harmful laser frequencies being rejected.
Furthermore, the wavelengths they mention
don't mater at all because they are all well beyond the infrared (see the image below). I assume that all scope mounted lasers are visible so they can actually see what they are shooting, except for the rare case they are "painting" a target with IR for an air strike like in that Polly Shore movie In the Army Now, but that's likely to only be harmful to the eyes if you stare right in the barrel. Laser classes are designated by human blink reflex and the amount of time a laser of a certain power would take to injure the eye. Invisible lasers (like IR and UV) are where the real problem is, but all plastic is opaque to UV, and glass and plastic is opaque to IR. I've worked in quite a few labs with high powered lasers, and other UV sources and cheap plastic safety glasses work just fine.