never see one for years then 2 come up at once-given the choice, would you go for a higher serial number at a lower price or a lower serial at a higher price?.......thats the choice i have-and before anyone says it-nah i cant afford both lol!

I think the higher serial/better price. You know that they are overall limited to 100 pieces, so they are rare to begin with. It just depends what your feeling is as a collector...

Personally, unless there's significance to lower serial numbers (such as on some X-metals), I wouldn't worry about it. There's really no signicance between #10 vs. #95 when you think about it. All IMO, of course.

Agreed. Unless you are talking 001 or something, I would take the better deal.

Yeah, #001 would be about the only one worth more to me.

lower price, serial numbers are cool, but nothing much more than a talking piece.

I agree with most everyone else here, since the Jordan's were a limited release of only 100, I would just get the cheaper one...unless it's #001 .

Or #100. I think having the last one is as great as having the first one.

Or #101, cause that would just throw our little world into chaos!

It's always done so in the past when we found our numbers out of whack.

IMO low serial numbers are a great way for a seller to try to command a higher premium, so I'd just go with the best price. It'd be cool to have #1 or #100, but trust me - you'll love the watch when you get it regardless of what the number is. Just be sure to post pics once you receive it!

34 is a good number.....

#34 is good, i got the chance of of one even lower in the very early #20s.....

Yeah any serial number is good. Go for the best value based on condition etc. I own No 8/100 brand new boxed never worn
. Beautiful watch. Just be careful of the sponge it does brake down over time